• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science (KBM)
  • Master's theses (KBM)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science (KBM)
  • Master's theses (KBM)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Novel methods to study intestinal microbiota

Mahmod, Farhad
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
mahmod_master2014.pdf (2.225Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/199074
Date
2014-07-31
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master's theses (KBM) [637]
Abstract
This thesis discusses the culture-dependent and culture-independent methods for the analysis of the human intestinal microbiota, with a special focus on the New Generation Sequecing procedures. The discussion includes the comparission of the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these techniques. These techniques include conventional methods and novel methods which depend on molecular sequencing, such as the first generation and next generation sequencing techniques with different platforms of next generation sequencing tecnologies. Library data collection methods were used such as books, textbooks, scientific journal articles, and online library databases such as ISI Web of Science, Bibsys, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google were used for this literature review paper. In conclusion, choosing among the increasing number of methods of analyzing human intestinal microbiota depends upon the goal and the target that is needed to be achived; sinces advantages and disadvantages are associated with all of these methods.
Has parts
The knowledge about mocrobiota is increasing because the techniques for studying of the composition, isolation, and identification of microbiota are an ongoing development process. Therefore, it is crucial to review. The intention of the study was to compare and discuss the different techniques.
Publisher
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit