Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJeannin, Marianne
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-22T14:19:48Z
dc.date.available2013-03-22T14:19:48Z
dc.date.copyright2012
dc.date.issued2013-03-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/189557
dc.description.abstractIn Benin, in response to the declining soil fertility and its effects on food insecurity and natural resources, farmers supported by external agents such as researchers, extension services and NGOs have developed new soil fertility management practices. In this study, we trace the history of the development of Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) initiatives in three different agro-ecological zones of Benin and highlight the different development phases and outcomes. We also present the different innovations that accompanied the use of ISFM practices, their triggers, the stakeholders involved and their role. The methodology adopted is qualitative case study research, where data were collected then analysed and finally validated by respondents. The data were collected through documents, semi-structure interviews of purposefully selected respondents and direct observation. The findings shows that ISFM practices besides being knowledge-intensive are often expensive in time and money but can raised crop yield and reduce food insecurity of the household. Some key factors for the success of ISFM initiatives had been drawn from the case studies which are: availability of technological options where soil fertility is a by-product, implication of farmers and farmers’ local knowledge during the entire development of soil fertility strategies, existence of partnerships between different stakeholders with wide range of expertise (e.g. economy, ecology, social sciences) and activities (e.g. buyers, input suppliers, credit supplier, policy-makers), easy access to inputs, output and financial market. It also demonstrates that technological changes need to be combined with social and institutional changes that create an enable environment for scaling-up of innovation. Thus, it is recommended to use an innovation system-based approach and not focusing on either the production or the marketing alone, but better working on the issue as a whole.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås
dc.subjectAgricultural innovationno_NO
dc.subjectIntegrated Soil Fertility Managementno_NO
dc.subjectBeninno_NO
dc.subjectFarmers’ knowledgeno_NO
dc.subjectJOLISAA projectno_NO
dc.titleAgricultural innovation in Africa : from soil fertility to market integration. A case study from Beninno_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Agriculture disciplines: 910::Soil sciences: 913no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber66no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel