| dc.contributor.advisor | Aune, Jens Bernt | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Vedeld, Pål | |
| dc.contributor.author | Philipson, Sara Lydia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-08T16:27:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-08T16:27:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier | no.nmbu:wiseflow:6839549:54592004 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3077308 | |
| dc.description | Full text not available | |
| dc.description.abstract | Forest protection is one of the most feasible mitigating strategies for climate change. Yet, the work to protect forests in Norway has come to a standstill. The thesis aimed to understand perception of how two forest protection policies are formulated and their outcome. Utilising semi-structured interviews, this is a comparative study of two forest protection policies, Voluntarty Agreement and Traditional Conservation in Norway. The findings show two complicated governance system where economic- and civil society actors represent two distinct perceptions. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Forest protection is one of the most feasible mitigating strategies for climate change. Yet, the work to protect forests in Norway has come to a standstill. The thesis aimed to understand perception of how two forest protection policies are formulated and their outcome. Utilising semi-structured interviews, this is a comparative study of two forest protection policies, Voluntarty Agreement and Traditional Conservation in Norway. The findings show two complicated governance system where economic- and civil society actors represent two distinct perceptions. | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås | |
| dc.title | Protecting our forests : a comparative study of voluntary agreement and traditional conservation | |
| dc.type | Master thesis | |
| dc.description.localcode | M-IES | |