Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorBurud, Ingunn
dc.contributor.advisorShafiee, Sahameh
dc.contributor.authorIjaz, Muhammad Fahad
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T13:49:49Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T13:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2985306
dc.description.abstractPre-harvest yield forecast is an important factor in high-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP). It also is critical for making policy decisions concerning food security. The developments in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology have provided cost-effective way to collect data from fields. Spectral bands data captured by UAVs is being used for increasing productivity, speeding up the breeding process, and select plants for desirable traits. However, most of the studies are limited to a single field or season. This study explores the possibility of using the data from multiple seasons and environments, along with weather information, to predict grain yield (GY) and days to maturity (DM) of spring wheat cultivars. The inclusion of weather data and spectral indices can increase the prediction score for wheat traits prediction for multi-environment, multi-spectral, timeseries remote sensing data of spring wheat cultivars. To validate this hypothesis, couple of integration methods were used to aggregate the multi-spectral data captured on several dates to make them comparable and usable together in a machine learning model. The multi-spectral data was collected at two different environments in 2019 and 2020(at both Vollebekk, Ås; Norway and Hamar, Staur, Norway). Grain yield and days to maturity were the wheat traits tested with the proposed method. A range of 28 spectral indices and 80 variations of weather features were tested along with 5 spectral bands, using multiple machine learning models to assess their contribution in predicting grain yield and days to maturity of spring wheat cultivars. The data from multiple dates was separately integrated using Simpson’s rule and Composite Trapezoidal Rule and the results identified that the latter consistently delivers better prediction score. The results confirm the hypothesis that the addition of weather data in the feature set improves the prediction score for both target variables, compared to models without weather data. Spectral bands did not contribute much to the prediction score of the models, with spectral indices, along with weather features, usually being more important features contributing towards prediction score. The processed datasets with machine learning models were more accurate in predicting days to maturity than they were for grain yield prediction. Sequential feature selection was applied to address multicollinearity in the features set. A group of 11 features were identified that could predict grain yield with comparable prediction score instead of using the complete features set. For days to maturity prediction, a set of 23 features were selected which could be even further reduced to 10 features. The results of this study support the integration using composite trapezoidal rule, for data collected on multiple dates, and inclusion of weather data for developing wheat traits prediction models.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Åsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectwheaten_US
dc.subjectplant sciencesen_US
dc.subjectphenotypingen_US
dc.subjectHigh-Throughput Phenotypingen_US
dc.subjectHTPen_US
dc.subjectHigh-Throughput Plant Phenotypingen_US
dc.subjectHTPPen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_US
dc.subjectUAVen_US
dc.subjectUAV Remote Sensingen_US
dc.subjectUnmanned aerial vehicleen_US
dc.subjectmultispectralen_US
dc.subjecthyperspectralen_US
dc.subjectweatheren_US
dc.subjectfieldsen_US
dc.subjectwheaten_US
dc.subjectgrainen_US
dc.subjectyielden_US
dc.subjectgrain yielden_US
dc.subjectmaturityen_US
dc.subjectdays to maturityen_US
dc.subjectheadingen_US
dc.subjectdata scienceen_US
dc.subjectstauren_US
dc.subjectmasbasisen_US
dc.subjectgraminoren_US
dc.subjectroboten_US
dc.subjectintegrationen_US
dc.subjectarea under the curveen_US
dc.subjectAUCen_US
dc.subjectarea under curveen_US
dc.subjectsimpsonen_US
dc.subjectsimpsons ruleen_US
dc.subjectcomposite trapezoidal ruleen_US
dc.subjectDroneen_US
dc.subjectDJIen_US
dc.subjectrandom foresten_US
dc.subjectgradient boostingen_US
dc.subjectregressoren_US
dc.subjectregressionen_US
dc.subjectlassoen_US
dc.subjectlinear regressionen_US
dc.subjectvphenoen_US
dc.subjectvirtual phenomicsen_US
dc.subjectagronimicen_US
dc.subjectagricultureen_US
dc.titleSpring wheat trait prediction using combined multi-environment, weather and multispectral timeseries UAV dataen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400en_US
dc.description.localcodeM-MFen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal