Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorColman, Jonathan
dc.contributor.advisorEftestøl, Sindre
dc.contributor.authorHart, Evan Richard
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-12T15:08:07Z
dc.date.available2021-08-12T15:08:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2767640
dc.description.abstractIncreasing amounts of infrastructure intersecting reindeer habitat in Fennoscandia also increases concern over negative effects on reindeer behavior and area use. Previous studies have shown variable results regarding area use, often related to spatiotemporal scale, while research on the effects of infrastructure on reindeer behavior has been limited. Can wildlife cameras contribute novel data? I analyzed data from wildlife cameras near power lines in two reindeer herding districts in Trøndelag and Nordland counties, Norway to investigate the reliability of wildlife cameras in identifying behavior and area use patterns, comparing with GPS collar data from the same sites and scales. Animal behavior data from wildlife cameras was used to test proportions of behavior types against habitat and distance to the line, compared with movement rate data from GPS collars. Meanwhile, presence/absence analysis based off camera data was used to identify area use relative to distance from power lines, compared with area use analyses based off GPS positions. Camera and GPS-data agreed in finding no significant negative effects by power line proximity on animal stress or relaxation behaviors, however camera data found behavior patterns not detected using GPS-data. Results were generally consistent between cameras and GPS-data for area use, finding no negative effects by power lines, however the limited scale and detail of the camera data, especially at the Trøndelag site, limited the power of results. Results suggest that cameras are a useful tool for the analysis of behavior relative to infrastructure, while camera data is likely more useful as a supplementary data source for area use analysis when alternative methods are limited. Potential issues with data handling and study design were also identified, which future studies using this technology can take into consideration. It is recommended that wildlife cameras be further applied and developed in this context in order to better inform management of reindeer populations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Åsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectReindeeren_US
dc.subjectBehavior Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectPower Linesen_US
dc.subjectInfrastructureen_US
dc.subjectWildlife Camerasen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectSemi-Domestic Reindeeren_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.titleEvaluating wildlife cameras as a method to sample reindeer behavioren_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480::Ecology: 488en_US
dc.description.localcodeM-ECOLen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal