• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Dept. of Plant and Environmental Sciences (IPM) (closed for submissions from January 2014)
  • Master's theses (IPM)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Dept. of Plant and Environmental Sciences (IPM) (closed for submissions from January 2014)
  • Master's theses (IPM)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A methodology to compare specialized and mixed farming systems. Case studies, in the Netherlands and France.

Donzallaz, Guillaume
Master thesis
Thumbnail
Åpne
MSc thesis_Donzallaz Guillaume_Copie UMB_06 09 2012.pdf (2.284Mb)
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/189488
Utgivelsesdato
2012-11-09
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Master's theses (IPM) [204]
Sammendrag
This master thesis was carried out at Plant Research International in Wageningen, the Netherlands, within the framework of the double degree in Agroecology between ISARA-Lyon in France and UMB in Norway. The study was part of the CANTOGETHER project. Standing for Crops and ANimals TOGETHER, this European project aims at promoting innovative mixed farming systems in several case studies of Europe. In this thesis, the aim was to create a methodology, composed of a set of economic, social and environmental indicators, in order to compare mixed and specialized farming system and to test the methodology in two case studies in the Netherlands and in France. The analysis relies on two farm typologies based on the concepts of representative and typical farms. Accordingly, the two-scale methodology uses the farm accountancy data network (FADN) to compare farming systems over large areas and agri-environmental data collected on-farm to design innovative farming systems. The results are a first step towards understanding up scaling procedure of innovative mixed farming systems at district level. While the municipality of Winterswijk shows a higher potential to develop between-farm mixing, the Ribéracois however presents better possibilities to develop diversified on-farm mixing. Very heterogeneous areas of Europe render difficult to set up a harmonized methodology. The data heterogeneity of case studies and the importance to make good use of existing information and specificities of each case study prevails on harmonizing the set of indicators. The scientific soundness and efficacy of the methodology is empirically verified but further study is needed to validate all indicators. Additionally, a selection of a primary set of information that is required by all work packages and all case studies is necessary to have a common basis for work.
Utgiver
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit