Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKasza, Gyula
dc.contributor.authorIzsó, Tekla
dc.contributor.authorLangsrud, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorVrbos, Domagoj
dc.contributor.authorVeflen, Nina
dc.contributor.authorUeland, Øydis
dc.contributor.authorScholderer, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorMünter, Lars
dc.contributor.authorCsenki, Eszter
dc.contributor.authorSzakos, Dávid
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, James
dc.contributor.authorSüth, Miklós
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T14:13:36Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T14:13:36Z
dc.date.created2024-06-20T11:07:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationTrends in Food Science & Technology. 2024, 150 1-9.
dc.identifier.issn0924-2244
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3157594
dc.description.abstractBackground: Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries. Scope and approach: This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices. Key findings and conclusions: SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleInstitutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation
dc.title.alternativeInstitutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber1-9
dc.source.volume150
dc.source.journalTrends in Food Science & Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104594
dc.identifier.cristin2277685
dc.relation.projectNofima AS: 11897
dc.relation.projectEU/727580
dc.relation.projectNofima AS: 202104
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 314743
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record