Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSydenham, Markus A. K.
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Yoko L.
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Anders
dc.contributor.authorOlesen, Jens M.
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Henning Bang
dc.contributor.authorSkrindo, Astrid Brekke
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Claus
dc.contributor.authorNowell, Megan Sara
dc.contributor.authorVenter, Zander
dc.contributor.authorHegland, Stein Joar
dc.contributor.authorHelle, Anders Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorSkoog, Daniel Ingvar Jeuderan
dc.contributor.authorTorvanger, Marianne Strand
dc.contributor.authorHanevik, Kaj-Andreas
dc.contributor.authorHinderaker, Sven Emil
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Thorstein
dc.contributor.authorEldegard, Katrine
dc.contributor.authorReitan, Trond
dc.contributor.authorRusch, Graciela Monica
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T08:11:11Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T08:11:11Z
dc.date.created2024-07-03T10:52:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0906-7590
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3138490
dc.description.abstractClimate change, landscape homogenization, and the decline of beneficial insectsthreaten pollination services to wild plants and crops. Understanding how pollinationpotential (i.e. the capacity of ecosystems to support pollination of plants) is affectedby climate change and landscape homogenization is fundamental for our ability topredict how such anthropogenic stressors affect plant biodiversity. Models of pollina-tor potential are improved when based on pairwise plant–pollinator interactions andpollinator’s plant preferences. However, whether the sum of predicted pairwise interac-tions with a plant within a habitat (a proxy for pollination potential) relates to pollendeposition on flowering plants has not yet been investigated. We sampled plant–beeinteractions in 68 Scandinavian plant communities in landscapes of varying land-coverheterogeneity along a latitudinal temperature gradient of 4–8°C, and estimated pollendeposition as the number of pollen grains on flowers of the bee-pollinated plants Lotuscorniculatus and Vicia cracca. We show that plant–bee interactions, and the pollinationpotential for these bee-pollinated plants increase with landscape diversity, annual meantemperature, and plant abundance, and decrease with distances to sand-dominatedsoils. Furthermore, the pollen deposition in flowers increased with the predicted pol-lination potential, which was driven by landscape diversity and plant abundance. Ourstudy illustrates that the pollination potential, and thus pollen deposition, for wildplants can be mapped based on spatial models of plant–bee interactions that incorpo-rate pollinator-specific plant preferences. Maps of pollination potential can be used toguide conservation and restoration planning. ecological networks, ecosystem service mapping, landscape diversity, plant–pollinator interactions, pollination
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleClimatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–beeinteractions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants
dc.title.alternativeClimatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–beeinteractions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Zoology and botany: 480
dc.source.journalEcography
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ecog.07138
dc.identifier.cristin2280698
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 302692
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record