Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFlæten, Øystein Øygarden
dc.contributor.authorStafseth, Siv Anna Ulla-Britt Karlsson
dc.contributor.authorVinje, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Edda Aslaug
dc.contributor.authorSunde, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorWøien, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorDimitri, Beeckman
dc.contributor.authorPetosic, Antonija
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T10:40:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T10:40:03Z
dc.date.created2023-11-29T17:41:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationIntensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2023, 81 1-7.
dc.identifier.issn0964-3397
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3116846
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the 12-month cumulative incidence, characteristics, and associated factors of pressure injuries acquired in Intensive Care Units. Setting: Four intensive care units in a Norwegian University Hospital. Research methodology: A prospective observational cohort study using data from daily skin inspections during a quality improvement project. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Variables associated with the development of intensive care unit-acquired pressure injuries are presented with odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The 12-month cumulative incidence of patients (N = 594) developing intensive care unit-acquired pressure injuries was 29 % (172/594) for all categories and 16 % (95/594) when excluding category I pres- sure injuries (no skin loss). Cumulative incidence for patients acquiring medical device-related pressure injuries was 15 % (91/594) and 11 % (64/594) for category II or worse. Compression stockings (n = 51) and nasogastric tubes (n = 22) were the most frequent documented medical devices related to pressure injuries. Development of pressure injuries category II or worse was significantly associated with vasoactive drug infusions (OR 11.84, 95 % CI [1.59; 88.13]) and longer intensive care unit length of stay (OR 1.06, 95 % CI [1.04; 1.08]). Conclusion: The 12-month cumulative incidence of intensive care unit-acquired pressure injuries was relatively high when category I pressure injuries were included, but comparable to other studies when category I was excluded. Some medical device-related pressure injuries were surprisingly frequent, and these may be prevented. However, associated factors of developing pressure injuries were present and deemed non-modifiable. Implications for clinical practice: Awareness about pressure injury prevention is needed in the intensive care unit considering high incidences. Nurses can detect category I pressure injuries early, which may be reversed. Our findings show several factors that clinicians can control to reduce the risk of pressure injuries in the intensive care unit.
dc.description.abstractIncidence, characteristics, and associated factors of pressure injuries acquired in intensive care units over a 12-month period: A secondary analysis of a quality improvement project
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleIncidence, characteristics, and associated factors of pressure injuries acquired in intensive care units over a 12-month period: A secondary analysis of a quality improvement project
dc.title.alternativeIncidence, characteristics, and associated factors of pressure injuries acquired in intensive care units over a 12-month period: A secondary analysis of a quality improvement project
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber1-7
dc.source.volume81
dc.source.journalIntensive & Critical Care Nursing
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103587
dc.identifier.cristin2205624
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel