Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorello Torrellas, Eva
dc.description.abstractThe once highly controversial Grytten hydroelectric plant that lead to the Mardøla campaign in 1970, will have its concession reevaluated in 2020. With its construction two waterfalls of highest national importance, Mardalsfossen and Mongefossen, were laid bare. The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate proposes that a minimum water flow in Mongefossen be considered for the upcoming revision of the concession, as was earlier adopted in Mardalsfossen in 1990. By employing an environmental benefit-cost analysis (EBCA) as a social appraisal procedure, this thesis evaluates whether or not this proposal is welfare enhancing. With the growing values on tourism, recreational fishing and higher environmental standards combined with current low electricity prices, the conditions surrounding the concession have changed significantly with respect to those of the 1970s and 1980s. For this reason, this thesis also considers other possible measures to enhance social welfare in terms of flow rates and flow periods. This thesis finds that a greater net present value of the EBCA can be achieved if other methods than those proposed by NVE are adopted and that greater quantity of water is better allocated to other purposes than the production of electricity. Three characteristics are identified to be important in this respect: higher flows, longer periods and the possibility daytime/nighttime flow adjustment. Tourism is seen to be crucially important with regards to decision-making between different possible measures. Of sixteen cases considered for Mardalsfossen and Mongefossen, the solution than delivers the highest social surplus is found when daytime/nighttime adjustment of the flow in the waterfalls is combined with higher flow rates at daytime during the high tourist season. Compared to the minimum flow proposal of NVE, the increase in NPV is found to be 105% for Mardalsfossen with an increase in costs incurred by Grytten of 18%. For Mongefossen the corresponding increase in NPV is found to be 83% with an increase in costs of 60%.nb_NO
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås
dc.rightsNavngivelse 3.0 Norge*
dc.rightsNavngivelse 3.0 Norge*
dc.subjectBenefit-Cost Analysisnb_NO
dc.subjectHydroelectric power plantnb_NO
dc.subjectEnvironmental measurenb_NO
dc.subjectMinimum flownb_NO
dc.titleElectricity or the environment? : better economic use of the water resources in the Grytten power plantnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200nb_NO

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 3.0 Norge
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 3.0 Norge