Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRauw, Wendy M.
dc.contributor.authorRydhmer, Lotta
dc.contributor.authorKyriazakis, Ilias
dc.contributor.authorØverland, Margareth
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Hélène
dc.contributor.authorDekkers, Jack
dc.contributor.authorHermesch, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorAlban, Bouquet
dc.contributor.authorGómez Izquierdo, Emilio
dc.contributor.authorLouveau, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorGomez‐Raya, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T08:22:25Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T08:22:25Z
dc.date.created2021-01-27T09:46:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2020, 100 (9), 3575-3586.
dc.identifier.issn0022-5142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2828989
dc.description.abstractPig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on ‘protein from livestock animals’ to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleProspects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber3575-3586
dc.source.volume100
dc.source.journalJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jsfa.10338
dc.identifier.cristin1880111
dc.relation.projectEU/696231
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 272334
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel