• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin - NMBU
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin - NMBU
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Clinical and immunological responses in sheep after inoculation with Himar1-transformed Anaplasma phagocytophilum and subsequent challenge with a virulent strain of the bacterium

Eskeland, Sveinung; Stuen, Snorre; Munderloh, Ulrike G.; Barbet, Anthony; Crosby, Liliana; Lybeck, Kari Røste; Wilhelmsson, Peter; Lindgren, Per-Eric; Makvandi-Nejad, Shokouh; Tollefsen, Stig; Granquist, Erik Georg
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Thumbnail
View/Open
1-s2.0-S0165242720301914-main.pdf (4.278Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2823376
Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Journal articles (peer reviewed) [3942]
  • Publikasjoner fra Cristin - NMBU [4778]
Original version
10.1016/j.vetimm.2020.110165
Abstract
In Norway, the tick-transmitted bacterium Anaplasma phagocytophilum is estimated to cause tick-borne fever (TBF) in 300 000 lambs on pastures each year, resulting in economic and animal welfare consequences. Today, prophylactic measures mainly involve the use of acaricides, but a vaccine has been requested by farmers and veterinarians for decades. Several attempts have been made to produce a vaccine against A. phagocytophilum including antigenic surface proteins, inactivated whole cell vaccines and challenge followed by treatment. In the current study, a virulent wild type strain of A. phagocytophilum named Ap.Norvar1 (16S rRNA sequence partial identical to sequence in GenBank acc.no M73220) was subject to genetic transformation with a Himar1-transposon, which resulted in three bacterial mutants, capable of propagation in a tick cell line (ISE6). In order to test the immunogenicity and pathogenicity of the live, mutated bacteria, these were clinically tested in an inoculation- and challenge study in sheep. One group was inoculated with the Ap.Norvar1 as an infection control. After inoculation, the sheep inoculated with mutated bacteria and the Ap.Norvar1 developed typical clinical signs of infection and humoral immune response. After challenge with Ap.Norvar1, 28 days later all groups inoculated with mutated bacteria showed clinical signs of tick-borne fever and bacteremia while the group initially inoculated with the Ap.Norvar1, showed protection against clinical disease. The current study shows a weak, but partial protection against infection in animals inoculated with mutated bacteria, while animals that received Ap.Norvar1 both for inoculation and challenge, responded with homologues protection.
Journal
Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit