Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSanchez, David Carricondo
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorWabakken, Petter
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Ane
dc.contributor.authorMilleret, Cyril Pierre
dc.contributor.authorOrdiz, Andres
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Pérez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorWikenros, Camilla
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-16T15:41:11Z
dc.date.available2020-11-16T15:41:11Z
dc.date.created2020-07-31T10:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBiological Conservation. 2020, 244, 108514en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2688099
dc.description.abstractThe recovery of large carnivores in human-dominated landscapes comes with challenges. In general, large carnivores avoid humans and their activities, and human avoidance favors coexistence, but individual variation in large carnivore behavior may occur. The detection of individuals close to human settlements or roads can trigger fear in local communities and in turn demand management actions. Understanding the sources of individual variation in carnivore behavior towards human features is relevant and timely for ecology and conservation. We studied the movement behavior of 52 adult established wolves ((Canis lupus), 44 wolf pairs) with GPS-collars over two decades in Scandinavia in relation to settlements, buildings, and roads. We fit fine-scale movement data to individual step selection functions to depict the movement decisions of wolves while travelling, and then used weighted linear mixed models to identify factors associated with potential individual pair deviations from the general behavioral patterns. Wolves consistently avoided human settlements and main roads, with little individual variation. Indeed, after correcting for season, time of the day, and latitude, there was little variability in habitat selection among wolf pairs, demonstrating that all wolf pairs had similar movement pattern and generally avoided human features of the landscape. Wolf avoidance of human features was lower at higher latitudes particularly in winter, likely due to seasonal prey migration. Although occasional sightings of carnivores or their tracks near human features do occur, they do not necessarily require management intervention. Communication of scientific findings on carnivore behavior to the public should suffice in most cases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWolves at the door? Factors influencing the individual behavior of wolves in relation to anthropogenic featuresen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume244en_US
dc.source.journalBiological Conservationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108514
dc.identifier.cristin1821099
dc.source.articlenumber108514en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal