Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBergius, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorBuseth, Jill Tove
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T06:42:09Z
dc.date.available2020-11-02T06:42:09Z
dc.date.created2019-04-02T14:28:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of political ecology. 2019, 26 (1), 57-83.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1073-0451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2685956
dc.description.abstractSince the Rio+20 conference, 'greening' economies and growth has been key in international politics. Leading policy actors and businesses frame the emerging green economy as an opportunity to realize a triple-bottom line – people, planet and profit – and support sustainable development. In practice, two key trends stand out: in the global North, the main component of the green shift seems to imply technological and market-based solutions in the renewable energy sector. While this is also important in the global South, here green economy implementation is often interpreted as environmental protection along with modernization of, and shifts in access to and control over, natural resources ('green sectors'). In the case of the latter, combined with persisting high rates of poverty, we claim that the post-Rio+20 context has revitalized a 'green' version of modernization to become the leading discourse and approach within international development; namely green modernization. A wide range of development initiatives across the global South – with significant support from international businesses amidst a general private turn of aid – are framed in this light. We use the new, Green Revolution in Africa to illustrate how modernization discourses are reasserted under the green economy. What is new at the current conjuncture is the way in which powerful actors adopt and promote green narratives around long-standing modernization ideas. They recast the modernization trope as 'green.' In particular, we focus our discussion on three linked components; technology and 'productivism', the role of capital and 'underutilized' resources, and, lastly, mobility of land and people.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/22862/21903
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTowards a green modernization development discourse? The new, green revolution in Africaen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber57-83en_US
dc.source.volume26en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of political ecologyen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.v26i1
dc.identifier.cristin1689769
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 250975en_US
cristin.unitcode192,13,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for internasjonale miljø- og utviklingsstudier
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal