Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMolteberg, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorBergstrøm, Cassandra
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T11:15:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-07T11:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2000-09
dc.identifier.issn0809-4934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2671201
dc.description.abstractThe political nature of Development Studies is discussed, examining relationships between individuals and groups of scientists, professionals and local people. Although the implications of these relationships to validity differ, there is a common problem of marginalization and bias. There is a danger of assuming balanced negotiations - that all actors are power equals and all voices equally legitimate. Language is a tool used both consciously and unconsciously to instill worldviews and secure positions. An open style of writing and the creation of a shared lexicon would provide a forum for diversity where contrasts are seen as enriching, rather than detracting from our message. Transfer of ideas is also possible through metaphors. Metaphors have a possibility for inspiring transformation of understanding through seeing one concept in terms of another. The transformative functions of metaphors are fundamental to enabling us to develop theory not attainable from within other delineated scientific practices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Åsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNoragric Working Papers;21
dc.titleOur Common Discourse: Diversity and Power in Development Studiesen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::International politics: 243en_US
dc.source.pagenumber36en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel