Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMovik, Synne
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Lyla
dc.contributor.authorManzungu, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T11:52:09Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T11:52:09Z
dc.date.created2016-11-28T11:26:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationWater Alternatives - An interdisciplinary journal on water, politics and development. 2016, 9 (3), 434-455.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1965-0175
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2505255
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the entry and spread of IWRM in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. It traces how the idea of IWRM was pro moted and sustained throughout the region by mapping key events, actors and networks that were involved in promoting the approach. It highlights the importance of regional networks in promoting IWRM and shows how regional dynamics, playing out at the inter face between the global and local levels, influenced the adoption/adaptation and spread of IWRM. The article finds that the idea of IWRM 'hit the ground running' in SADC due to several contributing factors. These include: historical political connections between the member countries; historically rooted well established channels and connections with bilateral and multilateral donors; the success of networks such as the Global Water Partnership and WaterNet whose mandate was to promote the concept; and the fact that two-thirds of the region’s population live in transboundary basins with IWRM providing a suitable hook for transboundary cooperation, often inspired by European models. The article further argues that IWRM thrived because of strong donor agendas that were adapted by key SADC actors to suit strategic interests. It thus provided a platform for complex politically charged negotiations to reconcile apparently divergent goals such as infrastructure vs management and regional vs national interests. The practice of IWRM in the region is very much shaped by a conflation of regional, national and donor interests and has now acquired a life of its own, despite changing donor priorities.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe Flow of IWRM in SADC: The Role of Regional Dynamics, Advocacy Networks and External Actorsnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol9/v9issue3/335-a9-3-3/file
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Flow of IWRM in SADC: The Role of Regional Dynamics, Advocacy Networks and External Actorsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeThe Flow of IWRM in SADC: The Role of Regional Dynamics, Advocacy Networks and External Actorsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber434-455nb_NO
dc.source.volume9nb_NO
dc.source.journalWater Alternatives - An interdisciplinary journal on water, politics and developmentnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1404954
cristin.unitcode192,13,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for internasjonale miljø- og utviklingsstudier
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal