Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAngelsen, Arild
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T09:32:41Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T09:32:41Z
dc.date.created2016-09-02T15:02:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationReview of Development Economics. 2017, 21 (2), 237-264.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1363-6669
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2487273
dc.description.abstractThe initiative known as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) officially became part of the international climate agenda in 2007. At that time, REDD+ was an idea regarding payment to countries (and possibly also projects) for reducing emission from forests, with funding primarily from carbon markets. The initiative has since become multi-objective in nature; the policy focus has changed from a payments for environmental services (PES) approach to broader policies, and international funding primarily originates from development aid budgets. This “aidification” of REDD+ has made the program similar to previous efforts using conditional or results-based aid (RBA). However, the experience of RBA in other sectors has scarcely been addressed in the REDD+ debate. The alleged advantages of RBA are poorly backed by empirical research. This paper reviews the primary challenges in designing and implementing a system of RBA, namely, donor spending pressure, performance criteria, reference levels, risk sharing, and funding credibility. It then reviews the four partially performance-based, bilateral REDD+ agreements that Norway has entered with Tanzania, Brazil, Guyana, and Indonesia. These agreements and the aid experience provide valuable lessons for the design and implementation of future REDD+ mechanisms.
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleREDD+ as Result-based Aid: General Lessons and Bilateral Agreements of Norwaynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber237-264nb_NO
dc.source.volume21nb_NO
dc.source.journalReview of Development Economicsnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/rode.12271
dc.identifier.cristin1377696
cristin.unitcode192,11,0,0
cristin.unitnameHandelshøgskolen
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal