Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Tom L.
dc.contributor.authorKronenberg, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Erik
dc.contributor.authorElmqvist, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Baggethun, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T13:15:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-02T12:11:45Z
dc.date.available2016-11-11T13:15:17Z
dc.date.available2018-01-02T12:11:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationEcosystems (New York. Print) 2016, 19:1051-1063nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1435-0629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474025
dc.description-nb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe combination of climate change and urbanization projected to occur until 2050 poses new challenges for land-use planning, not least in terms of reducing urban vulnerability to hazards from projected increases in the frequency and intensity of climate extremes. Interest in investments in green infrastructure (interconnected systems of parks, wetlands, gardens and other green spaces), as well as in restoration of urban ecosystems as part of such adaptation strategies, is growing worldwide. Previous research has highlighted the insurance value of ecosystems in securing the supply of ecosystem services in the face of disturbance and change, yet this literature neglects urban areas even though urban populations are often highly vulnerable. We revisit the insurance value literature to examine the applicability of the concept in urban contexts, illustrating it with two case studies: watersheds providing drinking water for residents of Vancouver, Canada; and private gardens ensuring connectedness between other parts of urban green infrastructure in London, UK. Our research supports the notion that investments in green infrastructure can enhance insurance value, reducing vulnerability and the costs of adaptation to climate change and other environmental change. Although we recommend that urban authorities consider the insurance value of ecosystems in their decisionmaking matrix, we advise caution in relying upon monetary evaluations of insurance value. We conclude by identifying actions and management strategies oriented to maintain or enhance the insurance value of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems that are themselves resilient to external disturbances are better able to provide insurance for broader social–ecological systems. social–ecological systems; urban ecology urban ecosystem services; resilience; nature-base solutions; ecosystem restoration.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInsurance value of green infrastructure in and around citiesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2016-11-11T13:15:17Z
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social sciences: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10021-016-9986-x
dc.identifier.cristin1366506
dc.subject.keywordByøkologi / Urban Ecology
dc.subject.keywordResiliens / Resilience


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal