Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorKarlsen, Hans Erik
dc.contributor.advisorHaugen, Thrond Oddvar
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Hans Christian Sørnes
dc.coverage.spatialNorway, Drøbaknb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-21T11:51:00Z
dc.date.available2016-11-21T11:51:00Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2422115
dc.description.abstractThe sensory system initiating C-response and electric organ discharge (EOD) response in the hearing specialist elephantnose fish was studied in an experimental swing chamber set-up. The swing chamber is specially designed for producing controlled low frequency acoustic stimulus waveforms. The waveforms studied in the experiments were single cycle sinusoids of initial acoustic pressure and particle acceleration in the frequency range 10 Hz to 30 Hz, and mimicked key components in the acoustic signature of charging predatory fish attacks. The aim of the study was to reveal how initial acoustic pressure and particle acceleration trigger the inner ear sensory system in elephantnose fish to produce acoustic EOD- and C-responses. Acoustic startle behaviour was found to be optimally triggered by a combination of acoustic particle acceleration and compression, and very rarely by the same level of acoustic particle acceleration and rarefaction. Startle behaviours were highly directional, and this was ascribed to inner ear detection and coding of the direction of the initial particle acceleration. In the centre of the test chamber, acoustic startle behaviours were triggered by the particle acceleration component alone, but at significantly lower probability than when combined with compression. Startle behaviours observed in response to the low frequency stimuli greatly extended the known audible hearing range in elephantnose fish. Contrary to general opinion within the field of fish hearing, it was shown that acoustic pressure sensitivity is of behavioural relevance at very low sonic and infrasonic frequencies. The results of the study support the view that acute acoustic pressure sensitivity evolved independently several times in fish as adaptations to perform differentiated and more adaptable escapes from striking predatory attacks. EOD-responses were produced by the acoustic stimuli, and were significantly stronger to compression stimuli than to rarefaction stimuli. Why elephantnose fish emit a strong burst of EODs during acoustic startle behaviour is unclear, but may perhaps be as a distraction of electro-sensitive predators.nb_NO
dc.description.sponsorshipFinn Jørgen Walvigs Foundationnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås
dc.rightsNavngivelse 3.0 Norge*
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 3.0 Norge*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/no/*
dc.subjectFish behaviournb_NO
dc.subjectFish hearingnb_NO
dc.subjectStartle behaviournb_NO
dc.subjectEOD responsenb_NO
dc.titleEffects of low frequency acoustic pulses on startle behaviour and EOD activity in elephantnose fish (Gnathonemus petersii)nb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920::Other fisheries disciplines: 929nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber70nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeM-ECOLnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 3.0 Norge