• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • School of Economics and Business (HH)
  • Master's theses (HH)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
  • School of Economics and Business (HH)
  • Master's theses (HH)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The economic and welfare impact of increasing transmission capacity in the electricity market: the case of skagerrak iv

Seifu, Woubit Alemayehu
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
wubit_thesis.pdf (7.249Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/187458
Date
2013-05-29
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master's theses (HH) [925]
Abstract
In this paper we present an empirical analysis of the economic and welfare impact of

increasing the transmission capacity by taking Skagerrak 4 with 700 MW between South

Norway (NO1) and West Denmark (DK1) as a case study. We examine the impact of

increasing the transmission capacity on electricity prices, trade and overall welfare gains

using simulation modeling. Moreover, we explore the potential for further expansions. To

address these issues, we first developed an empirical model for both market using hourly

data set from 2004 to 2010. For the simulation part, we took different years and initial

reservoir levels. Our findings show that the transmission capacity upgrade amplifies the

power flows from low cost generation area (NO1 in wet year and DK1in dry year) to high

cost generation area (NO1 in dry year and DK1 in wet year). With regards to prices,

following the path of export, NO1’s price increases for high inflow and reservoir level as

well as peak hours and it decreases for low inflow and reservoir level. In contrast, price in

Dk1 decreases when NO1 has more water and during peak hours. During off-peak load

hours, price increases as DK1 increases its exports during these hours leading to price

convergence. However, we still have price spikes during wet year. From net welfare point

of view, the results show that upgrading the interconnection improves social welfare

when NO1 has high inflows. For a dry year, transmission capacity upgrade leads to a net

welfare loss even if DK1’s welfare improves when NO1 has high initial reservoir level.

Further upgrading the transmission capacity by 1400MW has still a room for welfare

improvement in wet year. However, upgrading the capacity by 2100MW has no significant impact on net welfare.
Publisher
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit